Ronald Glen Lamoreaux v. James Thomas

Good Law
961 F.2d 216·1992 WL 84192
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 199291-16015California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald Glen LAMOREAUX, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James THOMAS, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-16015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 24, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald Glen Lamoreaux, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 A state prisoner must exhaust all available state remedies either on direct appeal or through collateral proceedings before a federal court may consider granting habeas corpus relief. Duckworth v. Serrano, 454 U.S. 1, 3 (1981) (per curiam); Lindquist v. Gardner, 770 F.2d 876, 877 (9th Cir.1985); 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (b). If state remedies have not been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.