Acevedo

People v. Acevedo

Good Law
147 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1038·209 Cal. App. 4th 1040·2012 WL 4553090
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 3, 2012No. B220081California5,418 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chaney, J.

The appellants were arrested on charges arising from seizures of over 350 kilograms of cocaine, 50 pounds of methamphetamine, 650 pounds of marijuana, firearms, and more than $1.2 million in illegal proceeds, *1046 resulting from investigations involving court-authorized wiretaps. After being convicted on drug trafficking charges, they challenge the trial court’s refusal to compel discovery of redacted and sealed portions of the documentation supporting the wiretap authorization orders, and its refusal to suppress the resulting wiretap and other evidence that led to their arrest. These rulings, they contend, violated their rights under state and federal law. We will affirm.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A 14-count information, filed October 31, 2008, charged appellants Rufino Acevedo, Steven Montes, Augustin Alvarez and Omar Cruz (and one other person not a party to this appeal) with some or all of the following crimes: conspiracy to commit possession and transportation of cocaine for sale (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. (a)(1)); 1 Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351, 11352); possession for sale, and transportation, of a controlled substance (cocaine) (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11351, 11352,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.