Maughan

Maughan v. Correia

Good Law
148 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1103·210 Cal. App. 4th 507·2012 WL 5233515
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2012No. D058957California6,510 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Benke, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

This is a dispute between a sister and brother over their respective holdings in a family run corporation. Royal Hospitality, Inc. (RHI), is an S corporation owned entirely by six siblings of the Correia family. 2 RHI’s sole business is the operation of a hotel in San Diego that had been previously owned and operated by plaintiff Maureen Correia Maughan (Maureen), her former husband Ben Maughan (Ben) and her parents Mary and Maurice E Correia (the Correias).

Defendant Maurice P. Correia (Maurice), Maureen’s brother, formed RHI for the specific purpose of purchasing the hotel after the Maughans and the Correias became delinquent on their loan payments and the bank foreclosed. After that purchase, Maureen and Maurice became enmeshed in a dispute regarding how ownership of RHI ultimately would be apportioned among them, their parents and their other siblings. Maurice maintained that he was initially, and for a period of several years would continue to be, the sole owner of RHI, but that after a certain period of time, Maureen and the other family members would be able to exchange the value of their capital contributions to RHI for equity in the company.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.