Leal

People v. Leal

Good Law
149 Cal. Rptr. 3d 9·2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1126·210 Cal. App. 4th 829·2012 WL 5305688
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2012No. A131366California8,503 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kline, J.

*833 Opinion

This probation case presents recurring issues arising when a trial court considers imposing, consistent with the Lent test (People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, 486 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545 ]), a condition of probation restricting medical use of marijuana under the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (CUA) (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5) and the Medical Marijuana Program (MMP) (Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.7 et seq.). 1 Daniel Lee Leal challenges such a condition imposed on him. Finding that imposition of the condition was not an abuse of discretion, we shall affirm the judgment.

Background

A jury found that Leal possessed marijuana for sale (§ 11359) while armed (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (a)(1)), plus three firearm offenses (Pen. Code, former §§ 12031, subd. (a)(1), 12021, subd. (c)(1), 12025, subd. (a)(2), (b)(6)), and resisting a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)); the court granted him three years’ formal probation, prohibiting him from all marijuana use, including medical use. Sentencing also disposed of a case arising while Leal was out on bail in the first case. The charge was also possessing marijuana for sale (§ 11359), this time with an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.