Neiman
Neiman v. Leo A. Daly Co.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Chaney, J.
Plaintiff Ellen Neiman filed this personal injury action after she fell on stairs at a theater on the campus of Santa Monica Community College. She appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Leo A. Daly Company (LAD), the architect that designed the theater and observed its construction. Neiman contends the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that LAD established the affirmative defense of the “completed and accepted” doctrine. Under this doctrine, once a contractor has completed its work and the owner has accepted it, the contractor is not liable to third parties injured as a result of a patent defect in the contractor’s work. Neiman argues she has raised a triable issue of material fact regarding whether the defect—lack of contrast marking stripes on the stairs—was patent or latent. We disagree with Neiman and affirm.
BACKGROUND
In late 2004, LAD entered into an agreement with Santa Monica Community College District (SMCCD), under which LAD agreed to design a theater arts building for SMCCD and observe the construction project. 1 According to SMCCD, construction of the Main Stage Theatre of Santa…