Darrell L. Bailey v. Michael Hennessey

961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darrell L. BAILEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16204. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * April 28, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell L. Bailey, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to comply with a court order to file an amended complaint. We review for an abuse of discretion, Malone v. United States Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 819 (1988), and we vacate and remand. 3 On June 6, 1990, Bailey filed a section 1983 complaint seeking money damages and injunctive relief against San Francisco County Jail officials Quinn, Hennessey, Cook, and Threets. On November 15, 1990, the district court dismissed the claims for injunctive relief as moot because…