Brenda Yvonne Armstrong v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brenda Yvonne ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-55888. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1992. * Decided April 28, 1992. Before ALARCON, BEEZER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brenda Armstrong appeals pro se the district court's denial of her motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . Armstrong was sentenced to 78 months in prison after she unconditionally pled guilty to possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute. The government agreed to drop count one of the indictment if she pled guilty to count two. Armstrong challenges her sentence on three grounds: (1) entrapment, (2) invalid search warrant, and (3) lack of intent. She also argues that the district court erred in denying her the opportunity to withdraw her plea. 3 Armstrong was approached by an undercover police officer and a police…