Marie R. Ramirez v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense William H. Ball, Iii, Secretary of the Navy

961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marie R. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard CHENEY, Secretary of Defense; William H. Ball, III, Secretary of the Navy, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55156. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 28, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marie R. Ramirez appeals pro se the dismissal of her action for failure to state a claim. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Ramirez is an employee of the Naval Electronics Systems Command (NAVELEX), an instrumentality of the United States Navy. Ramirez brought this action against the former and current Secretaries of Defense and the Navy, and five of her supervisors at NAVELEX. Her amended complaint contained ten counts; nine of the counts alleged…