Jose De La Rosa, AKA Jose Del La Rosa-Rodriguez AKA Jose R. De La Rosa v. United States

961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose DE LA ROSA, aka Jose Del La Rosa-Rodriguez; aka Jose R. De La Rosa, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-55535. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 27, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose De La Rosa, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. De La Rosa, who pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), contends that the district court did not establish a factual basis for his guilty plea as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(f). We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 For a section 2255 movant to successfully challenge a guilty plea based on a violation of Rule 11, he must…