Feibush

Bell v. Feibush

Good Law
151 Cal. Rptr. 3d 546·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 21·212 Cal. App. 4th 1041·2013 WL 151156
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 2013No. G046166California3,211 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fybel, J.

Introduction

Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a) (section 496(a)) makes receiving or buying property “that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft” a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. Section 496, subdivision (c) (section 496(c)) provides that any person “who has been injured by a violation of [section 496(a)] . . . may bring an action for three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff, costs of suit, and reasonable attorney’s fees.” (Italics added.)

A default judgment was entered against Igal J. Feibush for breach of contract, fraud, and treble damages under section 496(c). He challenges the treble damages on the ground he was never convicted in a criminal proceeding of the acts giving rise to liability under section 496(c). He argues a defendant must be convicted under section 496(a) before a private plaintiff may recover treble damages against that defendant under section 496(c).

We hold, based on the statutory language, a criminal conviction under section 496(a) is not a prerequisite to recovery of treble damages under section 496(c). We also hold the phrase “any manner constituting theft” under section 496(a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.