Jorge Rendon-Ramos v. United States

961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jorge RENDON-RAMOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55654. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 24, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge Rendon-Ramos, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. Rendon-Ramos contends the sentencing court erred by failing to award him a downward adjustment in his United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) offense level for his acceptance of responsibility and minor role in the offense. In addition, he claims the district court improperly included in its criminal history calculations a prior uncounseled conviction. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 Rendon-Ramos waived his right to attack these…