Ishmael Ali Muhammad v. Leonard Cardoza

961 F.2d 216 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ishmael Ali MUHAMMAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Leonard CARDOZA, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-15681. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 24, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ishmael Muhammad Cardoza, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. civil rights action against San Mateo County jail officials. We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment should be affirmed only if the evidence, read in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demonstrates that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id. 4 The…