Torres

People v. Torres

Good Law
152 Cal. Rptr. 3d 836·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 121·213 Cal. App. 4th 1151
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 15, 2013No. F063840California3,818 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Detjen, J.

Defendant Olivia Stephanie Torres contends she should have been sentenced to county jail pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (h), rather than to state prison. 1 The Attorney General agrees. We do not. Instead, we hold that when a sentence that otherwise would have been served in county jail pursuant to section 1170, subdivision (h) is ordered to run concurrently to a sentence already being served in state prison, the entire sentence must be served in state prison. This is so even though the sentence that was imposed first would have been served in county jail had it been imposed on or after October 1, 2011.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 12, 2010, defendant was charged, by complaint filed in Fresno County Superior Court case No. F10900198, with receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a); counts 1 & 2), possessing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a); count 3), and possessing a smoking device (id., § 11364; count 4). In addition, it was alleged defendant had served a prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) following her convictions, on July 17, 2006, for false personation (§ 529) and transportation or sale of methamphetamine (Health &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.