Prescott

People v. Prescott

Caution
153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 424·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 147·213 Cal. App. 4th 1473·2013 WL 694070
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2013No. B242196California1,736 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bigelow, J.

Errol Prescott was convicted of a felony and sentenced to five years in county jail pursuant to the Criminal Justice Realignment Act of 2011 (Realignment Act). (Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (h)(5)(B).) 1 Without notice, a hearing or a determination of Prescott’s ability to pay, the trial court ordered Prescott to pay $400 in attorney fees. Prescott contends he should have been granted a noticed hearing. Prescott further argues that the presumption that a defendant sentenced to state prison does not have the ability to pay defense costs (§ 987.8, subd. (g)(2)(B)) should apply because he was sentenced on a felony under the Realignment Act. We find the plain language of the statute prohibits application of the inability to pay presumption to county jail sentences. We vacate the order imposing $400 in attorney fees and remand the case to the trial court to conduct a hearing as contemplated by section 987.8.

DISCUSSION

Prescott pled no contest to a felony charge of unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle and also admitted to serving four prior prison terms. (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b).) He was sentenced to five *1476 years in county jail…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.