Guideone Mutual Insurance v. Utica National Insurance

Good Law
153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 463·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 148·213 Cal. App. 4th 1494·2013 WL 765651
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2013No. D059833California3,538 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nares, J.

This equitable contribution action involves three insurers, GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company (GuideOne), whose insurance policy covered an employee who negligently caused injuries to another person while driving his car in connection with business for his employer, Utica National Insurance Group and Graphics Art Mutual Insurance Company (collectively Utica), whose policies only covered the driver’s employer, which was only vicariously liable for the actions of its employee. GuideOne and Utica settled the underlying action, exhausting GuideOne’s primary and umbrella policies. GuideOne thereafter sought and obtained, by summary judgment, contribution in the amount of $600,000 from Utica’s umbrella policy, representing an alleged overpayment by GuideOne based upon its pro rata share of coverage. Utica appeals, asserting that because its umbrella policy covered a party only vicariously liable, it should not share pro rata with GuideOne’s umbrella policy that covered the tortfeasor employee.

We conclude the court erred in awarding GuideOne equitable contribution in the amount of $600,000 from Utica’s umbrella policy, which represented GuideOne’s pro rata share of coverage…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.