Zamora

Zamora v. Lehman

Good Law
153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 724·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 169·214 Cal. App. 4th 193·2013 WL 831083·35 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 94
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2013No. B237984California8,103 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Mallano, J.

Three executives signed employment agreements with their corporate employer. Each agreement contained a provision stating that if *197 either party—the executive or the corporation—had “[a]ny claim” against the other, the claiming party had to present the claim in writing to the other party within one year of the date the claiming party knew or should have known about the facts giving rise to the claim. Otherwise, the claim was forever barred. Subsequently, the employer filed for bankruptcy.

Plaintiff, the trustee in bankruptcy, filed this action against the three executives, alleging a breach of fiduciary duty. After litigating the breach of fiduciary duty claim in court but before trial, all three executives moved to compel arbitration of the claim pursuant to an arbitration clause in their employment agreements. The trial court granted the motions to compel. On appeal, we reversed as to two of the executives on the ground they had waived the right to arbitration; we concluded the third executive had not waived the right to arbitration, but the trustee declined to arbitrate the claims against him, and he was therefore dismissed from the suit (Zamora v. Lehman (2010)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.