West

West v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Bad Law
154 Cal. Rptr. 3d 285·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 207·214 Cal. App. 4th 780·2013 WL 1104739
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2013No. G046516California8,555 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fybel, J.

Introduction

As authorized by Congress, the United States Department of the Treasury implemented the Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP) to help homeowners avoid foreclosure during the housing market crisis of 2008. “The goal of HAMP is to provide relief to borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgage payments or who are likely to default by reducing mortgage payments to sustainable levels, without discharging any of the underlying debt.” (Bosque v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (D.Mass. 2011) 762 F.Supp.2d 342, 347 .)

*786 After her home loan went into default, plaintiff Genevieve West agreed to a trial period plan (TPP), a form of temporary loan payment reduction under HAMP, from defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase Bank), 1 which had acquired her loan from the original lender. West complied with the terms of the TPP, and timely made every reduced monthly payment on her loan during the trial period and afterwards. Nonetheless, Chase Bank denied West a permanent loan modification, and West’s home was sold at a trustee’s sale just two days after Chase Bank told her, so West alleged, that no foreclosure sale was scheduled.

West brought this lawsuit alleging fraud,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.