Delgado

People v. Delgado

Good Law
154 Cal. Rptr. 3d 337·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 222·214 Cal. App. 4th 914·2013 WL 1140614
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2013No. B240880California1,518 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The recently enacted Realignment Act (Act) (Pen. Code, § 1170, subd. (h)) 1 provides that certain adult felons receive commitments to county jail instead of state prison. The Act excludes felons who have prior serious or violent felony convictions. It appears to exempt from this exclusion felonies that stem from juvenile adjudications. In this respect, the Act conflicts with the “Three Strikes” law (§§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)), which the Legislature can amend only by a supermajority vote (§ 667, subd. (j)). We therefore hold that felons whose records include juvenile adjudications that involve serious or violent felonies may not receive county jail commitments under the Act.

Arturo Delgado appeals a judgment after conviction upon guilty plea of resisting an executive officer. (§ 69.) He admitted two prior serious or violent strikes, both of which were juvenile adjudications. (§§ 1170.12, subds. (a), (b)(1) & (3), 667, subds. (c), (d)(1) & (3).) We order a correction to the abstract of judgment regarding presentence custody credit and otherwise affirm.

*917 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Delgado was first declared a ward of the court when he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.