Mecano

People v. Mecano

Good Law
154 Cal. Rptr. 3d 519·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 224·214 Cal. App. 4th 1061·2013 WL 1176529
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2013No. B233401California4,522 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aldrich, J.

INTRODUCTION

A jury found defendant and appellant Russell Mecano, a police officer, guilty of solicitation of prostitution, sexual battery by restraint, sexual penetration by force or duress, and sexual penetration under threat by a public official. In the published portion of this opinion, we consider and reject Mecano’s contention that because he never explicitly requested sex for money, there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of solicitation of prostitution. We find that Mecano’s words, coupled with his overt acts, constituted sufficient evidence of the crime. In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we reject his remaining challenges to his conviction. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Factual background.

A. Prosecution case.

1. Taylor P.

On October 20, 2007, Taylor P. was 18 or 19 years old and homeless, living on the streets of Santa Monica with her boyfriend, Eric A. That night, *1064 Taylor slapped a woman who approached Eric. Los Angeles Police Officers Mecano and James Matthews arrived. Mecano told Taylor she was in a lot of trouble, but he could help her out. Unsure what to think about what Mecano said,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.