Cho

Cho v. Chang

Good Law
161 Cal. Rptr. 3d 846·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 715·219 Cal. App. 4th 521·2013 WL 4774136
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2013No. B239719California2,240 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Epstein, J.

*523 Opinion

Appellant Jessica Chang appeals from a trial court order that in part denied her special motion to strike. After Chang filed suit against respondent Howard Cho and codefendant Midway International, Inc. (Midway), for sexual harassment and related torts, Cho filed a cross-complaint against Chang, alleging defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Chang filed a special motion to strike the cross-complaint as a “SLAPP” (strategic lawsuit against public participation) suit, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. 1 She contends the activities giving rise to her claims were protected and, hence, that the trial court should have granted her motion in full and struck the cross-complaint in its entirety. Chang also contends she should have been awarded attorney fees.

There is a further complication. Each of the causes of action in the cross-complaint combines allegations of conduct that is protected by the anti-SLAPP statute with conduct that is not. 2 We are satisfied that the better view in such a case is that the trial court may strike the allegations in the cross-complaint attacking the protected activity while allowing the unprotected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.