Anaya

People v. Anaya

Good Law
164 Cal. Rptr. 3d 216·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 896·2013 D.A.R. 14·221 Cal. App. 4th 252·2013 WL 5943968
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2013Nos. F063835, F064116California8,397 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Peña, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendants Adam Daniel Anaya and Eric Thomas Wolfe were tried together in the Superior Court of Tulare County on various criminal charges stemming from their forceful attempts to collect a criminal street gang debt. After their convictions, defendants were sentenced separately and appealed separately. Following consolidation of their appeals, defendants contend (1) the convictions must be reversed because (a) the jury was provided conflicting instructions on the manner to assess the key witness’s credibility, and (b) juror misconduct; (2) there is insufficient evidence to support (a) the extortion convictions, (b) the dissuading a witness convictions, and (c) the one battery conviction; (3) the life terms imposed for the extortion and the dissuading a witness convictions are not authorized; (4) as defendants have been improperly convicted of both robbery and receiving stolen property, the convictions for receiving stolen property must be reversed; (5) this case must be remanded for the trial court to impose or strike the gang enhancements to the term for the burglary convictions and the receiving stolen property convictions; and (6) multiple enhancements for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.