Franco

People v. Franco

Good Law
181 Cal. Rptr. 3d 778·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 1174·232 Cal. App. 4th 831
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2014No. F067223California1,172 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Detjen, J.

INTRODUCTION

The Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (hereafter the Act) created a postconviction release proceeding for third strike offenders serving indeterminate life sentences for crimes that are not serious or violent felonies. If such *833 an inmate meets the criteria enumerated in Penal Code section 1170.126, subdivision (e), he or she will be resentenced as a second strike offender unless the court determines such resentencing would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety. 1 (§ 1170.126, subd. (f); People v. Yearwood (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 161, 168 [ 151 Cal.Rptr.3d 901 ].)

After the Act went into effect, Robert Luna Franco (defendant), an inmate serving a term of 25 years to life following conviction of a felony that was not violent (as defined by § 667.5, subd. (c)) or serious (as defined by § 1192.7, subd. (c)), filed a petition for recall of sentence and resentencing under the Act. Following a hearing addressing the facts pertaining to risk of danger, the petition was denied.

In the published portion of this opinion, we explain that while a trial court has the authority to obtain a supplemental probation officer’s report at the stage of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.