Noriega

People v. Noriega

Good Law
188 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 520·237 Cal. App. 4th 991
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2015No. E059713California4,667 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Miller, J.

Defendant and appellant Arturo Mendez Noriega raped and sodomized his girlfriend’s stepdaughter, Jane Doe, from 2003 until 2010. Defendant was convicted of nine counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child by means of rape. 1 (Pen. Code, § 269, subd. (a)(1).) 2 Defendant was sentenced to consecutive 15-year-to-life sentences on each count for a total state prison sentence of 135 years to life. He was ordered to pay a $10,000 restitution fine within the meaning of section 1202.4, subdivision (b)(1), and a stayed parole revocation fine in the same amount was also imposed pursuant to section 1202.45.

Defendant now claims on appeal as follows: (1) Doe’s direct testimony should have been stricken in its entirety because defendant did not have a meaningful opportunity to cross-examine her, which violated his federal constitutional due process and confrontation rights; (2) the trial court erred by failing to sua sponte instruct the jury with the lesser included offense of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor (Pen. Code, § 261.5, subd. (c)) for all counts; (3) a statement made by Doe’s sister, who also was molested by defendant, that defendant was just sitting in court and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.