Olson

Olson v. Superior Court

Good Law
190 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715·238 Cal. App. 4th 1458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2015No. B258767California2,384 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Christopher Dale Olson filed for divorce from Heather Rae Olson, requesting joint custody of their two young children. 1 Heather did not respond, and a default judgment of dissolution, including a custody order, was granted. Over a year later, Heather petitioned for a modification of the custody order. Christopher objected, contending that because the default judgment remained in effect, Heather lacked standing to request a modification.

The trial court ruled that Heather did have standing to seek the modification and ordered the couple to participate in a parenting plan assessment program. Although this order is not appealable, we exercise our discretion to treat this appeal as a petition for a writ of mandate and deny the petition.

We hold that a parent has standing under Family Code section 3087 to request a modification of a child custody judgment notwithstanding that the judgment sought to be modified was a default judgment taken against the parent who is petitioning for the change.

*1461 FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

On October 12, 2011, Christopher filed a petition for dissolution of marriage to obtain a divorce from Heather, his wife of nine years. Heather did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.