United States v. Donneal Robertson
Opinion
Opinion
961 F.2d 217 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donneal ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 15, 1992. * Decided April 24, 1992. Before HUG, TANG and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donneal Robertson appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed after he pled guilty to conspiracy, wire fraud, mail fraud, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 371, 1343, 1341. The district court found that Robertson and his codefendant created a fictitious company in whose name they ordered computer equipment which they subsequently sold. Defense counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The government did not respond. 3 Robertson and his codefendant created the Vern George Company as an allegedly legitimate company to buy computers and computer parts.…