United States v. Joe Martin Celaya

961 F.2d 217 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe Martin CELAYA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-16442. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 24, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joe Martin Celaya appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for correction of sentence. Celaya contends the district court erred by failing to order the United States Parole Commission ("Commission") to take custody of him, hold a parole revocation hearing immediately, and require that any time imposed be served concurrently with his state sentence. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. 3 In 1980, after entering a guilty plea to distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), Celaya was sentenced by the District of Arizona to…