John T. Williams v. B.J. Bunnell, Superintendent Attorney General, Ca, State of California

Good Law
961 F.2d 218·1992 WL 86500
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 199291-16014California434 words

Opinion

Opinion

961 F.2d 218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John T. WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Superintendent; Attorney General, Ca, State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-16014. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 27, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John T. Williams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Williams was convicted of robbery and use of a firearm during the robbery in violation of California Penal Code sections 211 and 12022.5. We review de novo, Norris v. Risley, 878 F.2d 1178, 1180 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm. 3 Williams first contends that there was not sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that he used a handgun during the commission of the robbery. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we hold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.