United States v. Darrell B. Warren

961 F.2d 218 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell B. WARREN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided April 27, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Darrell B. Warren appeals pro se his convictions, following a jury trial, for possession of five grams or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844 (a), possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1), and being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Warren contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 "We review for abuse of discretion a district…