Meraz

People v. Meraz

Bad Law
2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 1115·212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 81·6 Cal. App. 5th 1162
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 2016No. B245657California5,844 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Flier, J.

*1165 Opinion

Codefendants Juan Ramon Meraz, Juan M. Chambasis, and Victor Bibiano separately appeal their convictions and sentences for murder, attempted murder, and discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling following a gang-related shooting that killed two victims and seriously injured a third. We previously affirmed the judgments with certain corrections to their sentences. Our high court granted review and transferred the case to us for reconsideration of defendants’ confrontation clause challenges to the gang expert’s testimony in light of People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 [ 204 Cal.Rptr.3d 102 , 374 P.3d 320 ] (Sanchez). In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude reversal is not warranted under Sanchez , so we once again affirm the judgments as modified.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellants were jointly charged with the murders of Javier Zamora and Justin Curiel (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a); counts 1 & 2), 1 the attempted premeditated murder of Jose Santa Ana (§§ 187, subd. (a), 664; count 3), and discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling (§ 246; count 4). For the murder counts, multiple-murder and gang-murder special circumstances were alleged. (§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.