United States v. 45/194 Kg. Drums of Pure Vegetable Oil, Efamol, Ltd., Claimant-Appellant

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 4652·961 F.2d 808·1992 WL 67211·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6160·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2938
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199290-55086California2,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

McNAMEE, J.

FACTS

Appellant, Efamol Ltd., Surrey, England, researches, exports and markets evening primrose oil (EPO). EPO is made from the crushed seeds of the evening primrose plant. Efamol sells EPO as a dietary supplement of fatty acids.

In February 1979, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) informed Efamol representatives that EPO was not generally recognized as safe for use as a dietary supplement. If Efamol wanted to export EPO to the United States, it would have to file a Food Additive Petition with the FDA, pursuant to 21 C.F.R. section 171, or an affirmation petition in accordance with 21 C.F.R. section 170.35. Efamol informed the FDA it would no longer export EPO to the United States.

Despite Efamol’s assertion that it would not export EPO to the United States, Efam-ol has been shipping bulk EPO from the United Kingdom to Banner Gelatin Products (Banner) in Chatsworth, California since 1985. Banner mixes EPO with vitamin E and puts the combined mixture into soft gelatin capsules. The capsules are then shipped to distributors, who market them as a dietary supplement'.

On January 6, 1989, the FDA filed a Complaint for Forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. section 334 (a)(1), seeking the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.