United States v. Paul Bruce Carpenter

Bad Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 4811·961 F.2d 824·1992 WL 68675·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6443·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3048
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 199290-10641California2,775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Norris, J.

Former California state senator Paul B. Carpenter appeals his conviction on four counts of racketeering, extortion, attempted extortion, and conspiracy to commit extortion. Because the district court erred when it instructed the jury that no explicit quid pro quo was required to establish “official right” extortion under the Hobbs Act, we reverse Carpenter’s conviction on all four counts.

I

On March 15, 1990, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging Carpenter with four counts of racketeering, extortion, attempted extortion, and conspiracy to commit extortion. On August 3, 1990, a superseding indictment was filed containing the same charges. Count I of the superseding indictment charged Carpenter with racketeering in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c), based on six predicate acts. The first predicate act involved Carpenter’s alleged acceptance of a $20,000 campaign contribution from an FBI agent to ensure passage of AB 3773, which the indictment alleged to be a violation of California Penal Code § 86. The other five predicate acts involved separate instances in which Carpenter allegedly pressured lobbyists…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.