James W. McQuerry v. United States Parole Commission

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 5136·961 F.2d 842·1992 WL 72050·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6605·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 199291-55536California3,404 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

McQuerry is a federal prisoner. Following his conviction for distribution of cocaine, McQuerry was sentenced to a term of five years in prison and five years on special parole. His special parole was revoked twice. Both times, the United States Parole Commission credited all of McQuer-ry’s “street time.” McQuerry got into more trouble and eventually received a new sentence on a new marijuana distribution charge, to begin on the day after his release on the special parole violator term. After the date of his presumptive release on that term, however, the Commission reopened McQuerry’s case because it had erroneously credited the time spent on special parole. The Commission then modified previous orders to reflect that none of the time spent on special parole was to be credited. McQuerry, pro se, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for habeas relief, which the district court dismissed.

McQuerry mounts a number of challenges to the Commission’s authority to revoke street time credits once granted, and contends that it lacked jurisdiction to reopen his case for that purpose after his presumptive parole date had passed. He also argues that his rights to due process were violated when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.