United States v. Billy Joe Bagwell Cynthia Bagwell

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 5279·961 F.2d 1450·1992 WL 77719·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7285·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3372
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 199290-55841California3,314 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiggins, J.

OVERVIEW

Billy Joe Bagwell, defendant/appellant, appeals a district court order evicting him from public land and declaring his mining claim invalid. Bagwell argues that he is entitled to possess and reside on the public land under federal mining law. The United States, plaintiff/appellee, asserts that Bag-well’s mining claim is invalid due to bad faith and that Bagwell therefore has no right to reside on public land. Bagwell’s appeal was timely, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988). We affirm the district court’s order.

BACKGROUND

Since 1972, Billy Joe Bagwell has resided on 4.25 acres of the Angeles National Forest known as the Dora Day mill site. The mill site contained an abandoned residence and quartz reduction mill when Bagwell moved onto the land, and Bagwell occupies the land pursuant to a mill site claim under federal mining law. In 1979, a fire destroyed the mill and residence, and Bagwell resided off the mill site for the next fifteen months while rebuilding a residence on the site. After the new residence was completed, Bagwell returned to the mill site and rebuilt the mill from salvaged materials.

In the early 1980s, the United States Forest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.