Greenawalt v. Ricketts

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 5388·961 F.2d 1457·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7585·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3444
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 199288-1828California1,827 words

Opinion

Opinion

961 F.2d 1457 Randy GREENAWALT, Petitioner-Appellee, v. James R. RICKETTS, Director, Arizona DOC; Donald Wawrzaszek, Superintendent, ASP; Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General, State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellants. Nos. 88-1828, 88-1910. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 23, 1992. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, ALARCON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 The panel as constituted above has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. 2 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge called for an en banc vote, and a majority of the judges of the court has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b). 3 The petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected. 4 SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge, dissenting from Denial of Rehearing En Banc: 5 RE: Greenawalt v. Ricketts, Nos. 88-1828/1910, decided August 22, 1991 and published at 943 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir.1991). 6 I respectfully dissent from our court's decision not to hear this case en banc. Such a rehearing would have enabled us to reconsider the panel's decision in the light of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.