Alvin Howard Canell v. Multnomah County Sheriff, Multnomah County, Oregon

962 F.2d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alvin Howard CANELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF, Multnomah County, Oregon, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35168. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1992. * Decided May 8, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and CROCKER, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Oregon state prisoner Canell appeals the summary judgment in favor of the Multnomah County Sheriff (Sheriff) and several other persons in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Canell contends that he was deprived of due process, denied equal protection, and subjected to false imprisonment. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 We review the summary judgment de novo. Tzung v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 873 F.2d 1338, 1339 (9th Cir.1989). We must determine "whether, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the…