In Re Grand Jury Recalcitrant Witness. John Doe, Witness-Appellant v. United States

962 F.2d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re GRAND JURY RECALCITRANT WITNESS. John DOE, Witness-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 92-35036. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 1992. Decided May 11, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and CROCKER, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Doe appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to quash grand jury subpoenas and granting the government's motion to direct compliance with the subpoenas. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 , and we have jurisdiction to review the order. See In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 867 F.2d 539, 540 (9th Cir.1989); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated June 5, 1985, 825 F.2d 231, 236-37 (9th Cir.1987). We review the district court's denial of the motion to quash grand jury subpoenas for abuse of discretion. In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, 803 F.2d 493, 496 (9th…