Sherry B. Callahan Jonathan E. Hughes v. Gayle Guynup Mark Tansil Patricia Gray

962 F.2d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sherry B. CALLAHAN; Jonathan E. Hughes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gayle GUYNUP; Mark Tansil; Patricia Gray, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-15560, 91-16218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 8, 1992. Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sherry B. Callahan and Jonathan E. Hughes appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and imposition of a pre-filing order. We review the dismissal de novo, Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1447 (9th Cir.1987), and the imposition of the pre-filing order for an abuse of discretion, O'Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. 3 Callahan and Hughes challenge state court proceedings regarding personal injuries suffered by Hughes. As defendants, Callahan and Hughes named state court judges, the County of Sonoma, various private…