Ricardo Beas v. United States

962 F.2d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ricardo BEAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55290. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 11, 1992. Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricardo Beas, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. District Court Jurisdiction 3 Beas contends that the district court lacked subject matter, personal, and territorial jurisdiction over him at the time of his trial and sentencing. This contention lacks merit. 4 "The district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction ... of all offenses against the laws of the United States." 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . 5 Here, Beas was convicted for conspiracy to…