Earl Bellack v. United States

Good Law
962 F.2d 13·1992 WL 92722·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23431
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 199290-35115California1,070 words

Opinion

Opinion

962 F.2d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Earl BELLACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-35115. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 6, 1992. * Decided April 23, 1992. 1 Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and DAVIES, ** District Judge 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Earl Bellack appeals from the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). The district court found that Bellack's claim was not "a short and plain statement." The district court is correct, but we affirm on other grounds. Bellack did not have standing to bring this action. BACKGROUND 4 Plaintiff-Appellant Earl Bellack was a teacher of emotionally handicapped children until he resigned his position in 1980. Concerned that his school was violating Wisconsin state law, Bellack and three of his former students filed complaints (05-80-1130, 05-80-1193, 05-80-1195) with the U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.