Dorothy L. Davis v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General

962 F.2d 13 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dorothy L. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55702. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 11, 1992. Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dorothy L. Davis appeals the district court's summary judgment dismissing her Title VII action against Postmaster General Anthony M. Frank. Davis contends that the district court erred by dismissing a companion case, dismissing state law claims, denying a motion for recusal, and granting summary judgment on the basis that she had not established a prima facie case of disparate treatment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. I. Jurisdiction 3 Davis has filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment in this case, and not in the companion case. Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction to review…