Daniel Lloyd, Cascade Fire Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation v. Premier Industrial Corporation, a Foreign Corporation

962 F.2d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel LLOYD, Cascade Fire Equipment Company, an Oregon Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. PREMIER INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-35079. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1992. * Decided May 6, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge and CROCKER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellants Cascade Fire Equipment Company ("Cascade") and Daniel Lloyd (collectively, "C & L") appeal summary judgment against them in favor of Premier Industrial Corporation and Western Fire Equipment Company (collectively, "Western"). C & L had sued Western for wrongful initiation of civil proceedings. The district court had diversity jurisdiction and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 from the final judgment. We affirm. 4 Daniel Lloyd and James Richardson are former employees of Western. Lloyd worked for Western for…