Carl Paulson v. Federal Aviation Administration National Transportation Safety Board James B. Busey

962 F.2d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carl PAULSON, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; National Transportation Safety Board; James B. Busey, Respondents. No. 91-70382. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 7, 1992. Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carl Paulson petitions for review the National Transportation Safety Board's ("NTSB") order affirming the administrative law judge's ("ALJ") order of dismissal of his appeal as untimely. Paulson alleges that the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") violated his fifth amendment right to due process when it failed to notify his attorney about the suspension of Paulson's pilot license. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 1486 , and we deny Paulson's petition for review. 3 This court upholds decisions of the NTSB unless they are "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law." Winslow…