In re Janzen

Good Law
962 F.2d 14·1992 WL 92662·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23457
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 199291-15548California449 words

Opinion

Opinion

962 F.2d 14 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Gary S. JANZEN, dba the Janzen Group, fdba Janzen Creative Services, fdba Continuum, fdba Janzen Mullins, fdba Delaney Janzen, Debtor. James M. FORD, as Trustee of the Estate of Gary S. Janzen, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The FRESNO BEE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-15548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 14, 1992. * Decided April 29, 1992. Before HUG, TANG and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant James M. Ford, trustee of the estate of Gary Janzen, appeals the district court's reversal and remand of the bankruptcy court's decision for further proceedings. We DISMISS for lack of jurisdiction. 3 The district court reversed and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court to allow development of further factual evidence regarding 11 U.S.C. § 547 (c)(2)(C). The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction to hear appeals from "all final decisions, judgments, orders, and decrees"…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.