United States v. Allan Hayes

962 F.2d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 11, 1992. Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Allan Hayes appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Hayes contends that insufficient evidence supported his conviction because the government did not establish that he possessed four gallons of phencyclidine (PCP) found in airport luggage. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We examine the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction by reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and determining whether any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the…