United States v. Jack William Stokes

962 F.2d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack William STOKES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10148. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1992. Decided May 7, 1992. 1 Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and BURNS * , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendant/Appellant, Jack Stokes, appeals his conviction for bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) as well as the sentence he received under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) (1988); U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1. Stokes argues that the district court erred by denying his motion for a new trial based on the government's alleged Brady violation. He also argues that the district court erred in sentencing him to 240 months in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3581 . We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm the district…