United States v. Rudy Steven Martinez

Good Law
962 F.2d 15·1992 WL 99333·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23503
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 199291-50478California487 words

Opinion

Opinion

962 F.2d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rudy Steven MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50478. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1992. * Decided May 11, 1992. Before ALARCON, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudy Martinez was found guilty of drug and firearm offenses. He appeals his conviction. 3 * The officer had ample grounds to satisfy the reasonable suspicion test to stop Martinez. United States v. Rocha-Lopez, 527 F.2d 476, 477 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 977 (1976). The officer was patrolling an area that "is a notorious route for circumventing the Interstate 5 checkpoint." United States v. Medina-Gasca, 739 F.2d 1451, 1453 (9th Cir.1984). Cf. United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 884 (1975) (proper to consider the characteristics of an area). He observed Martinez driving a type of vehicle the officer had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.