United States v. Kelvis Bamidele

962 F.2d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KELVIS BAMIDELE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50628. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 7, 1992. Before ALARCON, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kelvis Bamidele argues that the district court made two errors in calculating his sentence, following his plea of guilty to fraud charges. First, he contends that the court erred in setting his offense level by including conduct that was not described in the charges to which he pled guilty. Second, he contends that the court erred in failing to grant a two-point adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. We affirm. 3 * Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, the base offense level for fraud is six, and points are added based on the dollar amount of the fraud to arrive at the total offense level. See U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(a) and (b)(1).…