United States v. Ali Ar Rasheed, AKA Ollie Larval Taylor

Good Law
962 F.2d 15·1992 WL 90139·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23512
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 199291-10515California693 words

Opinion

Opinion

962 F.2d 15 5 Fed.Sent.R. 343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ali Ar RASHEED, aka Ollie Larval Taylor Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10515. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1992. * Decided May 4, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, No. CR-91-0076-JVP; John P. Vukasin, District Judge, Presiding. N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. CHAMBERS, SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ali Ar Rasheed appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his guilty plea to selling firearms to a known felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (b)(1). 3 Rasheed argues that the trial court judge erred by sentencing him to the high end of the sentencing guideline range, and that the trial judge improperly relied on community standards. As evidence of this, defendant points to the judge's explanation for the sentence:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.