United States v. Jorge Canchola-Larios

962 F.2d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge CANCHOLA-LARIOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50343. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 7, 1992. Before ALARCON, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge Canchola-Larios appeals pro se the denial of his motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct a clerical error in his judgment and commitment order. We affirm. 3 Canchola-Larios was convicted after a jury trial of one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and one count of possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The court imposed concurrent sentences of ten years imprisonment and five years supervised release on each count. 4 Canchola-Larios contends that the district court erred in…