United States v. Clarence D. Williams

962 F.2d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence D. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30253. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 7, 1992. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing June 3, 1993. Before HUG, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Clarence D. Williams appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines) following his guilty plea to manufacturing marijuana plants and maintaining a place for the manufacture of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 856(a)(1). Williams contends that the district court erred by considering the information from a confidential informant in its decision to include 79 marijuana plants found in his codefendant's residence in its calculation of Williams' offense level. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the…